This is the first draft of the new simplified TD approach based on JSON-LD 1.1. Some definitions are not finished yet and are still in progress. A stable Thing Description deliverable version based on JSON-LD 1.0 can be found here.

This document describes a formal model and a common representation for a Web of Things (WoT) Thing Description. A Thing Description describes the metadata and interfaces of Things, where a Thing is an abstraction of a physical or virtual entity that provides interactions to and participates in the Web of Things. Thing Descriptions provide a set of interactions based on a small vocabulary that makes it possible both to integrate diverse devices and to allow diverse applications to interoperate. Thing Descriptions, by default, are encoded in a JSON format that also allows JSON-LD processing. The latter provides a powerful foundation to represent knowledge about Things in a machine-understandable way. A Thing Description instance can be hosted by the Thing itself or hosted externally when a Thing has resource restrictions (e.g., limited memory space) or when a Web of Things-compatible legacy device is retrofitted with a Thing Description.

Implementers need to be aware that this specification is considered unstable. Vendors interested in implementing this specification before it eventually reaches the Candidate Recommendation phase should subscribe to the repository and take part in the discussions.

Please contribute to this draft using the GitHub Issue feature of the WoT Thing Description repository. For feedback on security and privacy considerations, please use the WoT Security and Privacy Issues, as security and privacy is cross-cutting over all our documents.

Introduction

The Thing Description (TD) is a central building block in the W3C Web of Things (WoT) and can be considered as the entry point of a Thing (much like the index.html of a Web site). The TD consists of semantic metadata for the Thing itself, an interaction model based on WoT's Properties, Actions, and Events paradigm, a semantic schema to make data models machine-understandable, and features for Web Linking to express relations among Things.

Properties can be used for sensing and controlling parameters, such as getting the current value or setting an operation state. Actions model invocation of physical (and hence time-consuming) processes, but can also be used to abstract RPC-like calls of existing platforms. Events are used for the push model of communication where notifications, discrete events, or streams of values are sent asynchronously to the receiver. In general, the TD provides metadata for different communication bindings identified by URI schemes (e.g., "http", "coap", "mqtt", etc.), media types (e.g., "application/json", "application/xml", "application/cbor", "application/exi" etc.), and security mechanisms (for authentication, authorization, confidentiality, etc.). Serialization of TD instances is based on JSON and includes at least the TD core vocabulary as JSON keys as defined in this specification document.

Example 1 shows a simple TD instance in such a JSON serializiation and depicts WoT's Properties, Actions, and Events paradigm by describing a lamp Thing with the name MyLampThing.

{
    "id": "urn:dev:wot:com:example:servient:lamp",
    "name": "MyLampThing",
    "security": [{"scheme": "basic"}],
    "properties": {
        "status" : {
            "type": "string",
            "forms": [{"href": "https://mylamp.example.com/status"}]
        }
    },
    "actions": {
        "toggle" : {
            "forms": [{"href": "https://mylamp.example.com/toggle"}]
        }
    },
    "events":{
        "overheating":{
            "type": "string",
            "forms": [{
                "href": "https://mylamp.example.com/oh",
                "subProtocol": "LongPoll"
            }]
        }
    }
}

Based on this content, we know there exists one Property interaction resource with the name status. In addition, information is provided to indicate that this Property is accessible via (the secure form of) the HTTP protocol with a GET method at the URI https://mylamp.example.com/status (announced within the forms structure by the href key), and will return a string status value. The use of the GET method is not stated explicitly, but is one of the default assumptions defined by this document.

In a similar manner, an Action is specified to toggle the switch status using the POST method applied to the https://mylamp.example.com/toggle resource, where POST is again a default assumption for invoking Actions.

The Event pattern enables a mechanism for asynchronous messages to be sent by a Thing. Here, a subscription to be notified upon a possible overheating event of the lamp can be obtained by using the HTTP with its long polling sub-protocol at https://mylamp.example.com/oh.

This example also specifies the basic security scheme, requiring a username and password for access. In combination with the use of the HTTP protocol this indicates the use of HTTP Basic Authentication. Specification of a security scheme at the top level as in this example indicates that it is required for every resource. However, security schemes can also be specified per-interaction or per-form, with lower-level configurations overriding higher-level ones, allowing for the specification of fine-grained access control. Examples are provided later.

The TD in Example 1 reflects some additional defined default assumptions that are not explicitly described. For example, the media type of the exchange format of the interactions is assumed to be JSON (=mediaType) and the Property status resource is not writable as well as not observable. Specifically, the TD specification defines vocabulary terms (writable, observable, mediaType) that have default values. If these vocabulary terms are not explicitly used in a Thing Description instance, the Thing Description processor follows default assumptions for interpretation as defined in this specification.

The TD can be also processed as an RDF-based model. In that case, the Thing Description instance needs to be transformed into valid JSON-LD first. In terms of JSON-LD 1.1 serialization, the open-world assumption of RDF semantic processing requires vocabulary terms with default values to be always present explicitly in the instances. Example 2 shows the same TD in a JSON-LD 1.1 serializiation representing exactly the same information as in Example 1; however, default values have been filled in.

{
    "@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/td",
    "id": "urn:dev:wot:com:example:servient:lamp",
    "name": "MyLampThing",
    "security": [{"scheme": "basic", "in": "header"}],
    "properties": {
        "status": {
            "writable": false,
            "observable": false,
            "type": "string",
            "forms": [{
                "href": "https://mylamp.example.com/status",
                "http:methodName": "GET",
                "mediaType": "application/json"
            }]
        }
    },
    "actions": {
        "toggle": {
            "forms": [{
                "href": "https://mylamp.example.com/toggle",
                "http:methodName": "POST",
                "mediaType": "application/json"
            }]
        }
    },
    "events": {
        "overheating": {
            "type": "string",
            "forms": [{
                "href": "https://mylamp.example.com/oh",
                "subProtocol": "LongPoll",
                "mediaType": "application/json"
            }]
        }
    }
}
 

For more examples, including the use of other protocols besides HTTP, see Section .

Terminology

Generic WoT terminology is defined in [[!WOT-ARCHITECTURE]]: Thing, Thing Description (in short TD), Web of Things (in short WoT), WoT Interface etc.

Namespaces

The namespace for the W3C TD vocabulary as defined in this document is http://www.w3.org/ns/td.

Using content negotiation, this namespace serves either the TD ontology file (Turtle) or the TD context file (JSON-LD).

The suggested prefix for the TD namespace is td.

The security ontology that can be used with the TD is available at https://www.w3.org/ns/wot-security.

The data schema ontology that can be used with the TD is available at https://www.w3.org/ns/json-schema.

The TD will reuse existing vocabulary definitions such as for http from the http://www.w3.org/2011/http# namespace. In that case the prefix http is used. However, there are prefixes such as coap and mqtt which have no namespace yet. Currently there are efforts to have such namespace representations which will be referenced in the TD specification in the future. In the meantime, the [[!WOT-PROTOCOL-BINDING]] provides the list of terms that can be used to specify the protocol metadata in the Thing Description.

Conformance

As well as all sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.

The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL in this specification are to be interpreted as described in [[!RFC2119]].

A Thing Description instance complies with this specification if it follows the normative statements in Section and Section regarding Thing Description serialization.

A JSON Schema is provided in Annex to validate Thing Description instances based on JSON-LD 1.1.

In the future some information about RDF validation will be provided.

Information Model

Overview

The W3C Thing Description provides a set of vocabulary for describing physical and virtual Things. To increase interoperability the vocabulary terms are defined using the Resource Description Framework (RDF). All vocabulary restrictions noted in these tables MUST be followed,including mandatory items and default values.

In general, the Thing Description vocabulary set is grouped in three modules: the core Thing Description vocabulary reflecting WoT's paradigm of Properties, Actions, and Events (also see [[!WOT-ARCHITECTURE]]);the data schema vocabulary reflecting a subset of JSON Schema terms in a linked data representation; and the security vocabulary used to define security mechanismconfiguration requirements.

An overview of this vocabulary with its class context and class relation is given by the following three figures: the TD core model, the TD data schema model, and the TD security model. Please note that the figures reflect the vocabulary terms and structure as they would be used in a Thing Description instance (see Section ).The full ontology definitions of the different modules can be viewed by following the namespaces as provided in Section .

TD core model figure
TD core model
TD data schema model figure
TD data schema model
TD security model figure
TD security model

In the figures above, and in the tables to follow, items which have default values are indicated as being optional. However, technically, these are optional only in the JSON serialization. They are actually mandatory parts of the information model and are also mandatory in the JSON-LD serialization. In addition, the security scheme configuration is not actually optional even in the JSON serialization. Security configuration is mandatory at least one of the three levels at which it may be specified... so it can be omitted only if it is specified at a different level for each form. A future version of this document should better express the status of these attributes.

A detailed description of the vocabulary of the TD core model and TD data schema model is given in the next sub-section.

Core Vocabulary Definition

Thing

Describes a physical and/or virtual Thing (may represent one or more physical and/or virtual Things) in the Web of Things context.

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
idunique identifier of the Thing (URI, e.g. custom URN)yes.anyURI
supportProvides information about the TD maintainer (e.g., author, link or telephone number to get support, etc).no.string
nameName of the Thing.yes.string
descriptionProvides additional (human) readable information.no.string
baseDefine the base URI that is valid for all defined local interaction resources. All other URIs in the TD must then be resolved using the algorithm defined in [[!RFC3986]].no.anyURI
propertiesAll Property-based interaction patterns of the Thing.no.Property
actionsAll Action-based interaction patterns of the Thing.no.Action
eventsAll Event-based interaction patterns of the Thing.no.Event
linksProvides Web links to arbitrary resources that relate to the specified Thing Description.no.array of Link
securitySet of security configurations that must all be satisfied for access to resources at or below the current level, if not overridden at a lower level.no.array of SecurityScheme

InteractionPattern

Three interaction patterns are defined as subclasses: Property, Action and Event. When a concrete Property, Action or Event is defined in a Thing Description, it is called an "interaction resource". Interactions between Things can be as simple as one Thing accessing another Thing's data to get or (in the case the data is also writable) change the representation of data such as metadata, status or mode. A Thing may also be interested in getting asynchronously notified of future changes in another Thing, or may want to initiate a process served in another Thing that may take some time to complete and monitor the progress. Interactions between Things may involve exchanges of data between them. This data can be either given as input by the client Thing, returned as output by the server Thing or both.

Each instance of a Property, Action, and Event class has a (unique) name. See Section Representation Format for more details about JSON-LD 1.1 identifiers.

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
formsIndicates one or more endpoints from which an interaction pattern is accessible.yes.array of Form
labelProvides a label (e.g., display a text for UI representation) of the interaction pattern.no.string
descriptionProvides additional (human) readable information.no.string
securitySet of security configurations that must all be satisfied for access to resources at or below the current level, if not overridden at a lower level.no.array of SecurityScheme
scopesArray of authorization scope identifiers. These are provided in tokens returned by an authorization server and associated with forms in order to identify what resources a client may access and how.no.string

The class InteractionPattern has the following subclasses:

Property

Properties expose internal state of a Thing that can be directly retrieved (get) and optionally modified (set). In addition, Things can also choose to make Properties observable by pushing the new state (not an event) after a change; this must follow eventual consistency (also see CAP Theorem).

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
observableIndicates whether a remote servient can subscribe to ("observe") the Property, to receive change notifications or periodic updates (true/false).nofalseboolean
writableBoolean value that indicates whether a property is writable (=true) or not (=false).nofalseboolean

Property instances may also be instances of the class DataSchema and therefore can contain, among others, the type term.

Action

Actions offer functions of the Thing. These functions may manipulate the interal state of a Thing in a way that is not possible through setting Properties. Examples are changing internal state that is not exposed as a Property, changing multiple Properties, changing Properties over time or with a process that should not be disclosed. Actions may also be pure functions, that is, they may not use any internal state at all, and may simply process input data and return a result that directly depends only on the input given.

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
outputLink to the n-ary class that allows the declaration of the data type returned by an action.no.DataSchema
inputLink to the n-ary class that allows the declaration of the accepted data type of an action.no.DataSchema

Event

The Event Interaction Pattern describes event sources that asynchronously push messages. Here not state, but state transitions (events) are communicated (e.g., "clicked"). Events may be triggered by internal state changes that are not exposed as Properties. Events usually follow strong consistency, where messages need to be queued to ensure eventual delivery of all events that have occurred.

Instances of the Event class contains the term definitions of the class InteractionPattern and DataSchema.

Form

Communication metadata indicating where a service can be accessed by a client application. An interaction might have more than one form.

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
hrefURI of the endpoint where an interaction pattern is provided.yes.anyURI
mediaTypeAssign the underlying media type of an interaction pattern based on IANA (https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml).noapplication/jsonstring
relIndicates the expected result of performing the operation described by the form. For example, the Property interaction allows get and set operations. The protocol binding may contain a form for the get operation and a different form for the set operation. The rel attribute indicates which form is which and allows the client to select the correct form for the operation required.

The value of the rel attribute of the form must be one of readproperty, writeproperty, observeproperty, invokeaction, subscribeevent, or unsubscribeevent.

no.string

(one of "readproperty", "writeproperty", "observeproperty", "invokeaction", "subscribeevent", or "unsubscribeevent")

subProtocolIndicates the exact mechanism by which an interaction will be accomplished for a given protocol when there are multiple options. For example, for HTTP and Events, it indicates which of several available mechanisms should be used for asynchronous notifications.no.string

(one of "LongPoll")

securitySet of security configurations that must all be satisfied for access to resources at or below the current level, if not overridden at a lower level.no.array of SecurityScheme
scopesArray of authorization scope identifiers. These are provided in tokens returned by an authorization server and associated with forms in order to identify what resources a client may access and how.no.string

Link

A Web link, as specified by IETF RFC 8288 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8288).

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
hrefURI of the endpoint where an interaction pattern is provided.yes.anyURI
mediaTypeAssign the underlying media type of an interaction pattern based on IANA (https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml).noapplication/jsonstring
relIndicates the expected result of performing the operation described by the form. For example, the Property interaction allows get and set operations. The protocol binding may contain a form for the get operation and a different form for the set operation. The rel attribute indicates which form is which and allows the client to select the correct form for the operation required.no.string
anchorBy default, the context of a link is the URL of the representation it is associated with, and is serialised as a URI. When present, the anchor parameter overrides this with another URI, such as a fragment of this resource, or a third resource (i.e., when the anchor value is an absolute URI).no.anyURI

Data Schema Vocabulary Definition

DataSchema

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
descriptionProvides additional (human) readable information.no.string
typeAssignment of JSON-based data types compatible with JSON Schema (one of boolean, integer, number, string, object, array, or null).no.string

(one of "boolean", "integer", "number", "string", "object", "array", or "null")

constProvides a constant value.no.anyType
enumRestricted set of values provided as an array.no.array of anyType

The class DataSchema has the following subclasses:

ArraySchema

A JSON array specification ("type": "array").

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
itemsUsed to define the characteristics of an array.no.DataSchema
minItemsDefines the minimum number of items that have to be in the array.no.unsignedInt
maxItemsDefines the maximum number of items that have to be in the array.no.unsignedInt

ObjectSchema

A JSON object specification ("type": "object").

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
propertiesData schema nested definitions.no.DataSchema
requiredDefines which members of an object type are mandatory. Defines which members of the object type are mandatory.no.array of string

BooleanSchema

A JSON boolean value specification ("type": "boolean").

NumberSchema

A JSON number value specification ("type": "number").

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
minimumSpecifies a minimum numeric value. Only applicable for associated number or integer types.no.double
maximumSpecifies a maximum numeric value. Only applicable for associated number or integer types.no.double

StringSchema

A JSON string value specification ("type": "string").

IntegerSchema

A JSON integer value specification, that is, numbers without a fractional part ("type": "integer").

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
minimumSpecifies a minimum numeric value. Only applicable for associated number or integer types.no.integer
maximumSpecifies a maximum numeric value. Only applicable for associated number or integer types.no.integer

Security Vocabulary Definition

The set of security metadata supported by the core TD vocabulary is still under discussion. For the core vocabulary the focus is on well-established security mechanisms, such as those built into protocols supported by WoT or already in wide use with those protocols. Note that the vocabulary extension mechanism of the WoT Thing Description allows for additional security schemes if needed. The current set of security schemes is partly based on OpenAPI 3.0.1. The security schemes, vocabulary and syntax given in this specification share many similarities with OpenAPI; however, it is not fully compatible. Also, as OpenAPI targets only web services built around HTTP it does not cover the full set of use cases required for the IoT. Therefore, we are currently discussing metadata supporting additional security mechanisms for IoT-centered protocols such as CoAP and MQTT. For more information about what security schemes are under discussion (and to file issues if you have a request) please visit the WoT Security TF repository.

SecurityScheme

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
schemeIdentification of security mechanism being configured.yes.string

(one of "nosec", "basic", "cert", "digest", "bearer", "pop", "psk", "public", "oauth2", or "apikey")

descriptionProvides additional (human) readable information.no.string
proxyUrlURI of the proxy server this security configuration provides access to. If not given, the corresponding security configuration is for the endpoint.no.anyURI

The class SecurityScheme has the following subclasses:

NoSecurityScheme

A security configuration corresponding to ("scheme": "nosec"), indicating there is no authentication or other mechanism required to access the resource.

BasicSecurityScheme

Basic authentication security configuration ("scheme": "basic"), using an unencrypted username and password. This scheme should be used with some other security mechanism providing confidentiality, for example, TLS.

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
nameName for query, header, or cookie parameters.no.string
inSpecifies the location of security authentication information (one of header, query, body, or cookie).noheaderstring

CertSecurityScheme

Certificate-base asymmetric key security configuration ("scheme": "cert").

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
identityPre-shared key identity.no.string

DigestSecurityScheme

Digest authentication security configuration ("scheme": "digest"). This scheme is similar to basic authentication but with added features to avoid man-in-the-middle attacks.

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
qopQuality of protection (one of auth or auth-int).noauthstring
inSpecifies the location of security authentication information (one of header, query, body, or cookie).noheaderstring
nameName for query, header, or cookie parameters.no.string

BearerSecurityScheme

Bearer token authentication security configuration ("scheme": "bearer"). This scheme is intended for situations where bearer tokens are used independently of OAuth2. If the oauth2 scheme is specified it is not generally necessary to specify this scheme as well as it is implied.

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
authorizationUrlURI of the authorization server.no.anyURI
algEncoding, encryption, or digest algorithm (one of MD5, ES256, or ES512-256).noES256string
formatSpecifies format of security authentication information (one of jwt, jwe, or jws).nojwtstring
inSpecifies the location of security authentication information (one of header, query, body, or cookie).noheaderstring
nameName for query, header, or cookie parameters.no.string

PSKSecurityScheme

Pre-shared key authentication security configuration ("scheme": "psk").

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
identityPre-shared key identity.no.string

PublicSecurityScheme

Raw public key asymmetric key security configuration ("scheme": "public").

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
identityPre-shared key identity.no.string

OAuth2SecurityScheme

OAuth2 authentication security configuration ("scheme": "oauth2"). For the implicit flow the authorizationUrl and scopes are required. For the password and client flows both tokenUrl and scopes are required. For the code flow authorizationUrl, tokenUrl, and scopes are required.

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
authorizationUrlURI of the authorization server.no.anyURI
tokenUrlURI of the token server.no.anyURI
refreshUrlURI of the refresh server.no.anyURI
scopesArray of authorization scope identifiers. These are provided in tokens returned by an authorization server and associated with forms in order to identify what resources a client may access and how.no.string
flowAuthorization flow (one of implicit, password, client, or code).noimplicitstring

APIKeySecurityScheme

API key authentication security configuration ("scheme": "apikey"). This is for the case where the access token is opaque and is not using a standard token format.

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
inSpecifies the location of security authentication information (one of header, query, body, or cookie).noquerystring
nameName for query, header, or cookie parameters.no.string

PoPSecurityScheme

Proof-of-possession token authentication security configuration ("scheme": "pop").

Field NameDescriptionMandatoryDefault valueType
algEncoding, encryption, or digest algorithm (one of MD5, ES256, or ES512-256).noES256string
authorizationUrlURI of the authorization server.no.anyURI
formatSpecifies format of security authentication information (one of jwt, jwe, or jws).nojwtstring
inSpecifies the location of security authentication information (one of header, query, body, or cookie).noheaderstring
nameName for query, header, or cookie parameters.no.string

Thing Description Serialization

This is the first draft that uses JSON-LD 1.1 as a serialization format of the Thing Description. As that is work in progress, working assumptions are based on the latest Community Draft of JSON-LD 1.1. A new JSON-LD Working Group has already been chartered. It is planned that this section will conform to the latest working draft of their JSON-LD 1.1 deliverable and only use stable elements.

Thing Description instances are modeled and structured based on Section . This section defines a TD serialization based on JSON [[!RFC8259]].

Representation Format

The JSON serialization of TDs follows the syntax of JSON-LD 1.1 in order to streamline semantic evaluation. Hence, serializations can be parsed either as raw JSON or with a JSON-LD 1.1 processor.

In order to enable this convergence, all vocabulary terms defined in Section will have a JSON key representation.

In addition, Thing Description instances MAY contain JSON-LD 1.1 keywords such as @context and @type.

The data types of the vocabulary as defined in Section will be transformed to JSON-based types. The following rules are used for vocabulary terms based on some simple type definitions:

All vocabulary terms in Section associated with more complex class-based types are defined separately for structured JSON type transformation in the following subsections.

Thing as a whole

The root object of a Thing Description instance MAY include the @context key from JSON-LD 1.1 with the value URI of the Thing description context file http://www.w3.org/ns/td.

{  
    "@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/td",
    ...
}

http://www.w3.org/ns/td uses content negotiation to return the context file. Thus, it must be fetched with an Accept header set to application/ld+json.

When a Thing Description instance is processed and interpreted by a JSON-LD 1.1 processor the @context field MUST be present (see also Section JSON-LD 1.1 Processing).

When a single Thing Description instance involves several contexts, additional namespaces with prefixes MUST be appended to the @context array structure. This option proves relevant if one wants to extend the existing Thing Description context without modifying it. For instance:

{
    "@context": ["http://www.w3.org/ns/td",
                {"iot": "http://iotschema.org/"}],
    ...
}

Each mandatory and optional field name as defined in the class Thing MUST be serialized as a JSON key in the root object of the Thing Description instance.

The type of the fields properties, actions, and events MUST be a JSON object.

The type of the fields links and security MUST be a JSON array.

A TD snippet based on the defined fields of the class Thing without the optional field @context is given below:

{
    "id": "urn:dev:wot:com:example:servient:myThing",
    "name": "MyThing",
    "description": "Additional (human) readable information of the Thing.",
    "support": "https://servient.example.com/contact",
    "security": [...],
    "base": "https://servient.example.com/",
    "properties": {...},
    "actions": {...},
    "events": {...},
    "links": [...]
}

Alternatively, the same example can be written instead to explicitly include the (semantic) keys used by JSON-LD 1.1 (@context and @type):

{
    "@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/td",
    "@type": "Thing",
    "id": "urn:dev:wot:com:example:servient:myThing",
    "name": "MyThing",
    "description": "Additional (human) readable information of the Thing.",
    "support": "https://servient.example.com/contact",
    "security": [...],
    "base": "https://servient.example.com/",
    "properties": {...},
    "actions": {...},
    "events": {...},
    "links": [...]
}

properties

Properties (and sub-properties) offered by a Thing MUST be collected in the JSON-object based properties field with (unique) Property names as JSON keys.

Each mandatory and optional vocabulary term as defined in the class Property, as well as its two superclasses InteractionPattern and DataSchema, MUST be serialized as a JSON key within a Property object.

The type of the fields properties and items MUST be serialized as a JSON object.

The type of the fields forms, required, and enum, and potentially security, MUST be serialized as a JSON array.

A TD snippet based on the defined fields is given below:

{
    ...
    "properties": {
        "on": {
            "label": "On/Off",
            "type": "boolean",
            "forms": [...]
        },
        "status": {
            "type": "object",
            "properties": {
                "brightness": {
                    "type": "number",
                    "minimum": 0.0,
                    "maximum": 100.0
                 },
                 "rgb": {
                    "type": "array",
                    "items" : {
                        "type" : "number",
                        "minimum": 0,
                        "maximum": 255
                    },
                    "minItems": 3,
                    "maxItems": 3
                }
            },
            "required": ["brightness", "rgb"],
            "forms": [...]
        }
    }
    ...
}

Similar to the case at the Thing level, properties MAY have additional semantic annotations based on JSON-LD 1.1 keywords.

When a Thing Description instance is processed and interpreted by a JSON-LD 1.1 processor, each property MUST contain the vocabulary terms observable and writable due to the open-world assumption of Linked Data. This assumption means that if a Linked Data model of a Thing Description instance were to omit these vocabulary terms, then the interpreter would not be able to make any assumptions about their actual value.

A snippet of a JSON-LD 1.1 processable TD serialization including semantic annotations and the default values of observable and writable based on the class Property is given as follows:

    ...
    "properties": {
        "on": {
            "@type": "iot:SwitchToggle",
            "label": "On/Off",
            "writable": false,
            "observable": false,
            "type": "boolean",
            "forms": [...]
        },
        "status": {
            "writable": false,
            "observable": false,
            "type": "object",
            "properties": {
                "brightness": {
                    "@type": "iot:CurrentLevel",
                    "type": "number",
                    "minimum": 0.0,
                    "maximum": 100.0
                },
                "rgb": {
                    "@type": "iot:rgbData",
                    "type": "array",
                    "items" : {
                        "type" : "number",
                        "minimum": 0,
                        "maximum": 255
                    },
                    "minItems": 3,
                    "maxItems": 3
                }
            },
            "required": ["brightness","rgb"],
            "forms": [...]
        }
    }
    ...

actions

Actions offered by a Thing MUST be collected in the JSON-object based actions field with (unique) Action names as JSON keys.

Each optional vocabulary term as defined in the class Action and its superclass InteractionPattern MUST be serialized as a JSON key within an Action object.

The type of the fields input and output MUST be serialized as a JSON object.

The keys of input and output rely on the the class DataSchema.

The type of the field forms, and potentially security, MUST be serialized as a JSON array.

A TD snippet based on the defined fields is given below:

    ...
    "actions": {
        "fade" {
            "label": "Fade in/out",
            "description": "Smooth fade in and out animation.",
            "input": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "from": {
                        "type": "integer",
                        "minimum": 0,
                        "maximum": 100
                    },
                    "to": {
                        "type": "integer",
                        "minimum": 0,
                        "maximum": 100
                    },
                    "duration": {"type": "number"}
                },
                "required": ["to","duration"],
            },
            "output": {"type": "string"},
            "forms": [...]
        }
        ...
    }
    ...

Definitions within the actions field MAY have additional semantic annotations based on JSON-LD 1.1 keywords.

events

Events offered by a Thing MUST be collected in the JSON-object based events field with (unique) Event names as JSON keys.

Each optional vocabulary term as defined in the class Event, as well as its two superclasses InteractionPattern and DataSchema, MUST be serialized as a JSON key within an Event object.

The type of the fields properties and items MUST be serialized as a JSON object.

The type of the fields forms, required, and enum, and potentially security, MUST be serialized as a JSON array.

A TD snippet based on the defined fields is given below:

    ...
    "event": {
        "overheated": {
            "type": "object",
            "properties": {
                "temperature": { "type": "number" }
            },
            "forms": [...]
        }
        ...
    }
    ...

Definitions within the events field MAY have additional semantic anotations based on JSON-LD 1.1 keywords.

forms

Each mandatory and optional vocabulary term as defined in the class Form, MUST be serialized as a JSON key.

If required, forms MAY be supplemented with protocol-specific vocabulary terms identified with a prefix. See also [[!WOT-PROTOCOL-BINDING]].

When a Thing Description instance is processed and interpreted by a JSON-LD 1.1 processor, each forms (array) entry MUST contain a mediaType due to the open-world assumption of Linked Data. This assumption means that if a Linked Data model of a Thing Description instance were to omit these vocabulary terms, then the interpreter would not be able to make any assumptions about their actual value.

A TD snippet based on the defined fields is given below:

    ...
    "forms": [{
        "href" : "http://mytemp.example.com:5683/temp",
        "mediaType": "application/json",
        "http:methodName": "POST",
        "rel": "writeProperty",
        "security": [{"scheme":"basic", "in":"header"}]
    }]
    ...

security

Each mandatory and optional vocabulary term as defined in the class SecurityScheme, MUST be serialized as a JSON key.

The following TD snippet shows a simple security configuration specifying basic username/password authentication in the header. The value of in given is actually the default value of header.

   ...
   "security": [{
       "scheme": "basic",
       "in": "header"
   }]
   ...

Here is a more complex example: a TD snippet showing digest authentication on a proxy combined with bearer token authentication on an endpoint. Here the default value of in in the digest scheme, header, is implied.

    ...
    "security": [
        {
           "scheme": "digest",
           "proxyUrl": "https://portal.example.com/"
        },
        {
           "scheme": "bearer",
           "format": "jwt",
           "alg": "ES256",
           "authorizationUrl": "https://servient.example.com:8443/"
        }
    ]
    ...

Security definitions can be given at more than one level. In this case, definitions at the lower levels override (completely replace) the definitions at the higher level.

Security configuration is mandatory. Every form in a Thing MUST have a security configuration either provided in the form itself, at the interaction level directly above it (if security is not configured in the form), or at the Thing level (if security is not configured in either the form or at the interaction level). In the vocabulary defined above, note that security is marked as non-mandatory. However, this is only true locally (at a specific level), and only if the security is configured at a higher or lower level. In other words, a security configuration must be provided at some level for each form.

Security configuration is considered binding. The security configuration metadata provided in a Thing Description MUST accurately reflect the security requirements of the Thing. Some protocols can ask for authentication dynamically. If a protocol asks for a form of security credentials not declared in the Thing Description then the Thing Description is to be considered invalid.

The nosec security scheme is provided for the case that no security is needed. The minimal security configuration for a Thing is configuration of the nosec security scheme at the top level, as in the following example:

{
    "id": "urn:dev:wot:com:example:servient:myThing",
    "name": "MyThing",
    "description": "Additional (human) readable information of the Thing.",
    "support": "https://servient.example.com/contact",
    "security": [{"scheme": "nosec"}],
    "properties": {...},
    "actions": {...},
    "events": {...},
    "links": [...]
}

To give a more complex example, suppose we have a Thing where all interactions require basic authentication except for one interaction for which no authentication is required. In the following, the nosec scheme for the security configuration in the overheating event to indicate no authentication is required. For the status property and the toggle action, however, basic authentication is required as defined at the top level of the Thing.

{
    ...
    "security": [{"scheme": "basic"}],
    "properties": {
        "status": {
            ...
            "forms": [{
                "href": "https://mylamp.example.com/status",
                "mediaType": "application/json",
            }]
        }
    },
    "actions": {
        "toggle": {
            ...
            "forms": [{
                "href": "https://mylamp.example.com/toggle",
                "mediaType": "application/json"
            }]
        }
    },
    "events": {
        "overheating": {
            ...
            "forms": [{
                "href": "https://mylamp.example.com/oh",
                "mediaType": "application/json",
                "security": [{"scheme": "nosec"}] 
            }]
        }
    }
}

Security definitions can also can be given for different elements at the same level. This may be required for devices that support multiple protocols, for example CoAP and HTTP, with support for different security mechanisms. This is also useful when alternative authentication mechanisms are allowed. Here is a TD snippet demonstrating three possible ways to access a resource: via HTTPS with basic authentication, via HTTPS via digest authentication, or via CoAPS with an API key. In other words, the use of multiple security configurations at the same level provides a way to combine security mechanisms an in "OR" fashion. In contrast, putting multiple security configurations in the same security field combines them in an "AND" fashion, since in that case they would all need to be satisfied to allow access to the resource.

    ...
    "properties": {
        "status": {
            ...
            "forms": [
                {
                    "href": "https://mylamp.example.com/status",
                    "mediaType": "application/json",
                    "security": [{"scheme": "basic"}]
                },
                {
                    "href": "https://mylamp.example.com/status",
                    "mediaType": "application/json",
                    "security": [{"scheme": "digest"}]
                },
                {
                    "href": "coaps://mylamp.example.com:5683/status",
                    "mediaType": "application/json",
                    "security": [{"scheme": "apikey"}]
                }
            ]
        }
    },
    ...

Media Type

The JSON-based serialization of the TD is identified by the media type application/td+json.

CoAP-based WoT implementations can use the experimental Content-Format 65100 until a proper identifier has been registered.

The media type application/td+json MUST be also associated with the JSON-LD context http://www.w3.org/ns/td. That means that this media type can also be used for contextual identification of the vocabulary within a (simplified) TD instance that may omit the @context key term.

Neither the application/td+json media type nor a CoAP Content-Format identifier have been registered with IANA yet.

Implementation Notes

JSON Processing

The minimum requirement to read the content of a Thing Description instance is a (simple) JSON parser.

If the key terms writable and/or observable are not present within a properties definition, the default value defined in MUST be assumed.

If the mediaType key term is not present within a forms definition, the default value as defined in MUST be assumed.

To validate the semantic meaning and follow references to external context vocabulary terms (e.g., iot.schema.org), use of JSON-LD or RDF-based tools and libraries is highly recommended as explained in the next sub-section.

JSON-LD 1.1 Processing

To interpret the semantic meaning of a Thing Description in terms of RDF triples, a Thing Description instance first requires a valid JSON-LD 1.1 representation based on this Thing Description specification. Then this representation can be passed to a JSON-LD 1.1 processor.

The following pre-processing steps of a Thing Description instance must be executed before starting JSON-LD 1.1 processing:

  • Before starting JSON-LD 1.1 processing of a Thing Description instance, there MUST be a @context key from JSON-LD 1.1 as defined in Section .
  • Before starting JSON-LD 1.1 processing of a Thing Description instance, all external vocabulary terms used in the Thing Description MUST provide their context URIs as prefix or within the @context field.
  • Before starting JSON-LD 1.1 processing of a Thing Description instance, all mandatory vocabulary terms as defined in Section that are missing from the instance MUST be inserted explicitly with their default value.

Section shows an example of how the input and output of such preprocessing would appear.

Example Thing Description Instances

MyLampThing Example

{
    "id": "urn:dev:wot:com:example:servient:lamp",
    "name": "MyLampThing",
    "description" : "MyLampThing uses JSON-LD 1.1 serialization",
    "security": [{"scheme": "psk"}],
    "properties": {
        "status": {
            "description" : "Shows the current status of the lamp",
            "type": "string",
            "forms": [{
                "href": "coaps://mylamp.example.com/status"
            }]
        }
    },
    "actions": {
        "toggle": {
            "description" : "Turn on or off the lamp",
            "forms": [{
                "href": "coaps://mylamp.example.com/toggle"
            }]
        }
    },
    "events": {
        "overheating": {
            "description" : "Lamp reaches a critical temperature (overheating)",
            "type": "string",
            "forms": [{
                "href": "coaps://mylamp.example.com/oh"
            }]
        }
    }
}
{
    "@context": ["http://www.w3.org/ns/td", 
    		{"iot": "http://iotschema.org/"}],
    "@type" : "Thing",
    "id": "urn:dev:wot:com:example:servient:lamp",
    "name": "MyLampThing",
    "description" : "MyLampThing uses JSON-LD 1.1 serialization",
    "security": [{"scheme": "psk"}],
    "properties": {
        "status": {
            "@type" : "iot:SwitchStatus",
            "description" : "Shows the current status of the lamp",
            "writable": false,
            "observable": false,
            "type": "string",
            "forms": [{
                "href": "coaps://mylamp.example.com/status",
                "mediaType": "application/json"
            }]
        }
    },
    "actions": {
        "toggle": {
            "@type" : "iot:SwitchStatus",
            "description" : "Turn on or off the lamp",
            "forms": [{
                "href": "coaps://mylamp.example.com/toggle",
                "mediaType": "application/json"
            }]
        }
    },
    "events": {
        "overheating": {
            "@type" : "iot:TemperatureAlarm",
            "description" : "Lamp reaches a critical temperature (overheating)",
            "type": "string",
            "forms": [{
                "href": "coaps://mylamp.example.com/oh",
                "mediaType": "application/json"
            }]
        }
    }
}

Security and Privacy Considerations

In general the security measures taken to protect a WoT system will depend on the threats and attackers that system may face and the value of the assets needs to protect. A detailed discussion of security and privacy considerations for the Web of Things, including a threat model that can be adapted to various circumstances, is presented in the informative document [[!WOT-SECURITY-CONSIDERATIONS]]. This section includes only normative recommendations relevant to the WoT Thing Description.

A WoT Thing Description can describe both secure and insecure network interfaces. When a Thing Description is retro-fitted to an existing network interface, no change in the security status of the network interface is to be expected.

When designing new devices and services for use with the WoT, we have documented a set of best practices in [[!WOT-SECURITY-BEST-PRACTICES]] that SHOULD be followed. This best-practices document may be updated as security measures evolve. Following these practices does not guarantee security, but it at least will help to avoid common known vulnerabilities.

Some additional specific recommendations relate to privacy:

JSON Schema for TD Instance Validation

{
  "title": "WoT TD Schema for Bundang Plug Fest",
  "description": "JSON Schema representation of the TD serialisation format.",
  "$schema ": "http://json-schema.org/draft-06/schema#",
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "base": {
      "$ref": "#/definitions/url"
    },
    "@type": {
      "$ref": "#/definitions/type_declaration"
    },
    "@context": {
      "$ref": "#/definitions/context"
    },
    "name": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "id": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "description": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "properties": {
      "type": "object",
      "items": {
        "$ref": "#/definitions/properties"
      }
    },
    "actions": {
      "type": "object",
      "items": {
        "$ref": "#/definitions/actions"
      }
    },
    "events": {
      "type": "object",
      "items": {
        "$ref": "#/definitions/events"
      }
    },
    "links": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "$ref": "#/definitions/links"
      }
    },
    "support": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "security": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "$ref": "#/definitions/securityScheme"
      }
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "name",
    "id"
  ],
  "additionalProperties": true,
  "definitions": {
    "context": {
      "oneOf": [
        {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "$ref": "#/definitions/url"
              },
              {
                "type": "object"
              }
            ]
          },
          "contains": {
            "type": "string",
            "enum": [
              "https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/context/td-context.jsonld",
              "http://www.w3.org/ns/td"
            ]
          }
        },
        {
          "type": "string",
          "enum": [
            "https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/context/td-context.jsonld",
            "http://www.w3.org/ns/td"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    "type_declaration": {
      "oneOf": [
        {
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "type": "array"
        }
      ]
    },
    "form_declaration": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "$ref": "#/definitions/form_element"
      }
    },
    "form_element": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "href": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/url"
        },
        "rel": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "mediaType": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "subProtocol": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "security": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "$ref": "#/definitions/securityScheme"
          }
        },
        "scopes": {
          "type": "string"
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "href"
      ],
      "additionalProperties": true
    },
    "properties": {
      "additionalProperties": {
        "type": "object",
        "items": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/property_element"
        }
      }
    },
    "actions": {
      "additionalProperties": {
        "type": "object",
        "items": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/action_element"
        }
      }
    },
    "events": {
      "additionalProperties": {
        "type": "object",
        "items": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/event_element"
        }
      }
    },
    "property_element": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "description": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "@type": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/type_declaration"
        },
        "label": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "writable": {
          "type": "boolean"
        },
        "observable": {
          "type": "boolean"
        },
        "forms": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/form_declaration"
        },
        "scopes": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "security": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "$ref": "#/definitions/securityScheme"
          }
        }
      },
      "required": [],
      "additionalProperties": true
    },
    "action_element": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "description": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "@type": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/type_declaration"
        },
        "label": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "forms": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/form_declaration"
        },
        "input": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/data"
        },
        "output": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/data"
        },
        "scopes": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "security": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "$ref": "#/definitions/securityScheme"
          }
        }
      },
      "required": [],
      "additionalProperties": true
    },
    "event_element": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "description": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "@type": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/type_declaration"
        },
        "label": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "forms": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/form_declaration"
        },
        "scopes": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "security": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "$ref": "#/definitions/securityScheme"
          }
        }
      },
      "required": [],
      "additionalProperties": true
    },
    "links": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "anchor": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/url"
        },
        "href": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/url"
        },
        "rel": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "mediatype": {
          "type": "string"
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "href"
      ],
      "additionalProperties": true
    },
    "securityScheme": {
      "type": "object"
    },
    "url": {
      "type": "string",
      "format": "uri",
      "pattern": "(([^:/?#]+):)?(//([^/?#]*))?([^?#]*)(([^#]*))?(#(.*))?"
    },
    "jsonld_url": {
      "type": "string",
      "format": "uri",
      "pattern": "http://[^/?#]*|https://[^/?#]*"
    },
    "data": {
      "title": "Data type",
      "anyOf": [
        {
          "description": "URI of an XSD built-in type",
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "description": "URI and media type for a complex type (XSD, SenML...)",
          "type": "object",
          "properties": {
            "name": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "href": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "mediatype": {
              "type": "string"
            }
          },
          "required": [
            "name",
            "href",
            "mediatype"
          ]
        },
        {
          "$ref": "http://json-schema.org/draft-06/schema#"
        }
      ]
    },
    "dataSchema": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "description": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "enum": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "string"
              },
              {
                "type": "boolean"
              },
              {
                "type": "object"
              },
              {
                "type": "number"
              },
              {
                "type": "array"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "type": {
          "type": "string",
          "enum": [
            "string",
            "boolean",
            "object",
            "number",
            "array"
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Recent Specification Changes

Changes from Third Public Working Draft

Changes from Second Public Working Draft

Changes from First Public Working Draft

Changes from First Public Working Draft are described in the Second Public Working Draft

Acknowledgements

The editors would like to thank Dave Raggett, Matthias Kovatsch, Michael McCool, Michael Koster, Victor Charpenay, Kawaguchi Toru, Michael Lagally, Kazuyuki Ashimura, MarĂ­a Poveda, Daniel Peintner, Ben Francis for their contributions, comments, and guidance.